Home > consumer behaviour, consumer research > Should Consumer Research be Illegal?

Should Consumer Research be Illegal?

April 27th, 2009

One of the subjects that I think should be of interest to all consumer researchers is the law.

Not all that Jerome Vs Willensby in 1869 case law stuff, I can’t see much application for that, not studying the statute books either.  I’m talking about evidence, how it’s collected and how much weight can reasonably be attached to it.

Given their importance in the legal process, a lot of work has been done to examine the accuracy of eye-witness testimony.  It strikes me that if there were any question over people’s ability to accurately report on an event they witness involving someone else then similar problems may well exist when relying on a person’s ability to accurately report their own experiences.

In fact, given the role of the conscious mind as a post-rationalising device that has no direct access to the unconscious mechanisms that trigger our behaviour, there is reasonable argument to expect self-witnessing to be even less accurate.

So do these studies suggest eye-witnesses are reliable?

In a word, no.

One recent study for the journal Law and Human Behaviour found that false eye witness testimony contributed to more than three quarters of wrongful convictions (that were accurately resolved using DNA evidence).

A recently released study by psychologists at Iowa State University faked a crime in front a group of students and asked them to identify the perpetrator from photographs of five suspects, none of whom was the actual thief.  Just 16% of the 200 people interviewed said none of them was guilty.  Those who had picked rated their confidence in their selection as, on average, six out of ten.

When the witnesses were told that one of the five had confessed over 90% picked out one of the people from the line up and the average level of confidence increased from 6 to 8.5.  Remember, the thief wasn’t any of those pictured.

There are numerous theories about why these inaccuracies occur.  One study has found that  people focus so heavily on one dramatic or traumatic aspect of a scene (such as the gun in an armed raid) that they don’t really see much of anything else. 

Another has found that people have a very limited capacity for retaining information; as little as two pieces of information may be all that is retained from an event in the past.

From my own work, the nature of the questioning process is such that people can be unconsciously appealed to be helpful and to please the person asking the question, as a result they unwittingly (and equally unconsciously) prioritise trying to say something that will satisfy the interpersonal exchange that’s taking place at that moment over a ruthless reappraisal of the past.

This issue is just one of the reasons I’m incredibly wary of relying on consumers’ accounts of their consumer behaviour when I conduct research for clients.

My consumer behaviour company works on the premise that, when it comes to designing consumer research studies, it’s far better to assume customers can’t tell us what they think than to believe that they can or will.

Philip Graves

Tell someone else?
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • De.lirio.us
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • MyShare
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz

consumer behaviour, consumer research , , ,

  1. April 27th, 2009 at 11:19 | #1

    I have heard about questioning the ethics of neuro research into buying and consumer behavior.

    Bob Kaufer
    Sign Up for My Free Neuro Performance E Course Here

  2. Duane Cunningham
  3. April 27th, 2009 at 13:57 | #3

    Phil,

    Great information.

    >
    One recent study for the journal Law and Human Behaviour found that false eye witness testimony contributed to more than three quarters of wrongful convictions (that were accurately resolved using DNA evidence).
    >

    The unreliable witness recall and false memory is a shocking for the justice system. Also, it makes it so tempting for the bad guys to manipulate perceptions to the dangers of the others.

    John Ho
    Numerology Expert Helps Understanding Personalities for Better Influence & Persuasion (WordPress Blog)
    Numerology Expert Helps Understanding Personalities for Better Influence & Persuasion (Money Page)

  4. April 27th, 2009 at 14:13 | #4

    Fascinating question. Most people are not very aware of what is going on around them.
    Seize the Day,

    Rob
    Sales Eagles Soar Above the Competition!
    Personal Asset Protection For Small Business Owners

  5. April 27th, 2009 at 14:18 | #5

    We simply don’t know what we want, that is the reason it is so hard to know ourselves. The research is fascinating.

    Steve Chambers, The Sales Expert

    Are you a Sales Eagle?

  6. April 27th, 2009 at 15:42 | #6

    Great information. We humans are interesting creatures, aren’t we? Our beliefs and our subconscious minds amazing.

    Health, Fitness — Darryl Pace
    Fitness Product Review

  7. April 27th, 2009 at 18:29 | #7

    It has been proven over and over that eye witnesses are worse than unreliable. In another study, several people were shown a picture of a croweded subway in which a an older white woman was holing a knife. When shown the picture again, but without the knife, they were asked to point to the person who was holding the knife in the previous picture. Over 60 percent of the paricipants pointed to the professional looking black male who was clean cut and wearing a suit!

    Anthony
    http://www.anthonylemme.com

  8. April 27th, 2009 at 19:44 | #8

    Very interesting post Philip. It is amazing how inaccurately we see our world and how easily swayed we are by the subconscious.

  9. April 27th, 2009 at 23:02 | #9

    Very good information. I love how the mind reacts. Amazing how people process things depending on the situation they find themslves.

    Lynn Lane
    http://www.Warriorofsuccess.com
    Warrior Of Success Training

  10. April 27th, 2009 at 23:04 | #10

    When i was in the service we frequntly did awareness drills like the faked crime. Kind of like when someone asks you to look around the room and identify everything blue…and then asks how many brown items there where.

    Don Shepherd
    Oregon Flyfishing

  11. April 27th, 2009 at 23:31 | #11

    Fascinating post. It’s amazing how the power of suggestion can impose an alternative view of reality.

    Pam
    Invest in Your Future
    Great Minds, Great Wealth: How to Raise your Return, Reduce your Risk, Cut your Cost
    Personal Investment Strategies

  12. April 28th, 2009 at 00:10 | #12

    Fascinating how we decide what our reality is. There’s so much at play here.

    JJ Jalopy.
    Coaching Mentoring Expert JJ Jalopy
    How to become a coach with JJ Jalopy

  13. April 28th, 2009 at 00:24 | #13

    Fascinating and intriguing article. The human mind is an amazing machine.

    All the best,
    Yann
    http://www.ProfitsTactics.com

  14. April 28th, 2009 at 01:58 | #14

    Always hard to see ourselves, so easy to evaluate others.
    Christian Haller
    The Art of Good Eating
    Easy Italian Recipes

  15. April 28th, 2009 at 02:06 | #15

    I had heard of that before in relation to a murder that happened here about 20 years ago. The fellow was convicted on “eye witness” testimony…..20 years later, it came to light that the witnesses never agreed, none of them were accurate and he was innocent.

    Thanks for the insight

    JC

  16. April 28th, 2009 at 02:31 | #16

    Some therapists have even been accused of inducing false memories. It is scary how easy some people can be manipulated. Mark

    Marketingscoops

  17. April 28th, 2009 at 02:34 | #17

    Even therapists have been accused of inducing false memories. It is scary how easy some people can be manipulated. Mark

    Marketingscoops

  18. April 28th, 2009 at 03:31 | #18

    Wow you just explained so many things I deal with when someone is in my office for therapy!

    Great info
    Jen B
    The Harwood Center
    The Harwood Center Products

  19. April 28th, 2009 at 04:08 | #19

    Even therapists have been accused of inducing false memories. It is scary how easy some people can be manipulated. Mark

    Marketingscoops

    GlacierIceCream

  20. April 29th, 2009 at 01:24 | #20

    Indeed, and part of what is such a PROBLEM with is that juries BELIEVE eye-witness testimony is very accurate.

    We are emotionally attached to it as accurate even when the legal experts instruct and tell us otherwise.

    I imagine because we already had the emotional connection to it and the expert instructing us otherwise speaks to our logical mind and not to our emotional mind.

    Perhaps a primacy affect?

    Best regards,

    April Braswell

    Dating Quick Start Expert, Relationship Success Coach

    Divorce Support and Bereavement Support seminar, Henderson, Las Vegas

  21. April 30th, 2009 at 18:04 | #21

    This stuff is so interesting. I know that I have a terrible memory and I am easily persuaded. I would surely have been one of the people who picked out a suspect from a picture where none were actually the suspect.

    Lisa McLellan, Babysitting Services – Babysitters, Nannies, and Au-pairs

  22. May 1st, 2009 at 23:16 | #22

    Good case for not relying on consumer version of what they perceive; also good to know if called on jury duty.

    Pat
    Internet Dollars for Business Owners

  23. May 5th, 2009 at 14:53 | #23

    This post is so imformative and easy to understand..it helps to bring together all the different and fresh research and put it in to common sense…Thanks!!!

    David Power’s Hour
    Expert in Hypnosis, Success Thinking and Practical Parenting

  1. No trackbacks yet.