Much has been written in recent times about the so-called wisdom of crowds. This is the theory that aggregating the information in groups from individuals will result in decisions that are better than would have been arrived at by any individual member of that group. Some claim that such decisions will also be better than those from experts or expert committees. The difficulty with all of these theories is priming. The information that is imparted to extract the view of the crowd has the capacity to influence the outcome. If this ‘prime’ information is wrong the ‘wise crowd’ won’t correct this bias. It’s one thing when the answer being solicited is basic and straightforward: for example, “How much does this ox weigh?” It’s quite another when the question is more subjective and complex: “Is this the right political party to reverse the country’s economic troubles?” In the case of more […]

Recent Comments